いまの時間

ちょっと気になる言葉がある「建築性」。それが建築たる所以みたいなものと捉えているが、ついその「建築性」が疎かになってしまうような気がする。

おかしな話だが、建築性が無くても建築は成り立つ。極端に言えば、機能を満たし、法規を守れば、建築はできてしまう、そのような建築がほとんどだ。

例えば、建築性とは「不完全性とアクティビティー」「気分と感触」がいま、あるのではないかと考えている。

無くても良いとは思えず、あった方が良いの当たり前のことと捉えている、それが人にとって。

この建築性を磨き、建築として実存させることにいま一番時間を割いている。

B728731C-9915-4F99-84B9-0C517ECF258B.jpeg

"Time now"

There is a word which is a bit a little "Building property". It seems that it is like the thing that it is built, but it seems that its "architecturality" becomes unclear.

Although it is a funny story, building is established even if there is no building ability. In extreme terms, buildings can be built if they satisfy the function and keeping the regulations, such constructions are mostly.

For example, I believe that "building imperfections" have "imperfections and activities", "moods and feelings", and so on.

I do not think that it is not necessary, and I think that there was better being a good one, that is for people.

I am taking the most time to refine this architectural nature and make it exist as a building.